“runs” or “sessions” in Structural MRI - Purpose and Implications for Quality Control

“runs” or “sessions” in Structural MRI - Purpose and Implications for Quality Control

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

I am working on a graduate research project using the ABIDE I and II autism datasets.

MRIQC has been run on these data - and I now must remove participants marked as outliers on 3 specific quality metrics. However, I have run into an issue - there appear to be multiple "runs" per participant.

If, on one run, the participant fails QC stipulations, but not on another run, does this mean that the participant should be excluded from analyses? Or is the purpose of having multiple "runs" in structural MRI in order to have sufficient data that, if one run is "bad", another run can be used?

I have tried reading the MRIQC documentation; Googling; downloading and reading textbooks - for some reason, I find numerous resources on fMRI, but nothing for structural.

I would really appreciate any help anyone can offer - I am a bit desperate at this stage as my supervisors are on holiday.

Thank you for reading.

It is common to remove especially motion-corrupted MRI runs without excluding the subject.

Without more knowledge about the project it's hard to know why exactly they have multiple runs present and whether there are differences between runs or just repeated scans. It may be that the operators made sure to collect more data when they suspected subjects had too much motion during the scan, they may have done so randomly or by convenience (such as according to patient comfort), or they may have had other reasons.

I would consult other papers published using the same data set (even the functional ones) for their inclusion criteria.


  1. Karsten

    You are making a mistake. I propose to discuss it. Email me at PM, we will talk.

  2. Searle

    In it something is. Many thanks for the help in this matter.

  3. Hilal

    Well done, this very good sentence is just about right

  4. Amery

    So you can endlessly discuss ..

  5. Hussein

    You are not right. I am assured. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.

  6. Mazusho

    You are not right. I'm sure. Let's discuss. Email me at PM, we'll talk.

  7. Bedwyr

    It was and with me. Let's discuss this question. Here or in PM.

  8. Matsimela

    Sorry for interrupting you, but I offer to go in another way.

  9. Rico

    I forgot to remember.

Write a message